STATEMENT FROM FAMILY LAW PROFESSORS ACROSS THE STATE
We are family law professors who teach at every law school in the state of North Carolina. We speak on behalf of ourselves, rather than our institutions. Based on our professional expertise, the language of the proposed North Carolina amendment is vague and untested, and threatens harms to a broad range of North Carolina families. The amendment is phrased more broadly than most similar amendments in other states, and would therefore likely be construed by courts more broadly than in other states. The amendment would certainly ban same-sex marriages, civil unions, and domestic partnerships, and would very likely ban the domestic partnership health insurance benefits that a number of municipalities and counties currently offer to same- and opposite-sex unmarried couples. It also threatens a range of other protections for unmarried partners and their children, including domestic violence protections and child custody law. We are aware that some law professors at Campbell Law School think otherwise. In our view, this disagreement simply underscores the fact that Amendment One is vaguely worded and that it is not possible to know how broadly it will eventually be construed.
Jean Cary
Professor of Law
Campbell Law School
Scott Sigman
Associate Professor
Charlotte School of Law
Katharine Bartlett
A. Kenneth Pye Professor of Law
Kathryn Bradley
Professor of the Practice of Law
Director of Legal Ethics
Carolyn McAllaster
Clinical Professor of Law
Director, Duke Legal Project
Duke Law School
Sonya Garza
Assistant Professor
Elon School of Law
Kia H. Vernon
Assistant Professor of Law
North Carolina Central School of Law
Maxine Eichner
Reef C. Ivey II Professor of Law
Holning S. Lau
Associate Professor
UNC School of Law
Jennifer Collins
Professor of Law
Suzanne Reynolds
Executive Associate Dean and Professor of Law
Wake Forest School of Law